It’s not often Guttersnipe agrees with Alice Miles writing in the Times, especially when she’s having a pop at doctors. But today she’s taken the gloves off and gone after Guttersnipe’s favourite punchbag, John “Shut It!” Reid. How could I possibly oppose such a motion.
Her article today beautifully suggests that he should stop hiding behind paedophiles….
“TALK ABOUT a soft target: of all the parade of grotesques who pass through the courts, Craig Sweeney is especially horrifying. To abduct and sexually assault a three-year-old girl, twice, before terrifying her with a 100mph chase with a police car and then throwing her out of a vehicle on to the side of the road to be found by the police later does, as the judge in the case commented, beggar belief. “
And I’m sure you’re all in agreement with me here. This man was horrific, hanging’s too good fer ‘em.
“For a Home Secretary looking for tough headlines, this must have appeared an easy one: Sweeney’s sentence was too lenient and the case should be reconsidered, demanded John Reid publicly. In speaking out so quickly, our new Home Secretary engaged his mouth before his brain, and not for the first time. Never mind for a moment that his intervention may make an appeal against the sentence harder to win”
Yup… fuckwit Reid has bollocksed the appeal cases up again, further to his jeopardizing deportation cases before it would appear that he hasn’t learned. Even his own Attorney General has called him a fuckwit!
But he clearly doesn’t listen to the lawyers so I will reiterate my former sentiments to Dr. Reid.
YOU HEADLINE GRABBING FECKTARD – WHAT THE FECK ARE YOU THINKING?
ARE YOU THINKING AT ALL?
KEEP YOUR NOSE OUT YOU REACTIONARY GOBBY TWAT!
There… that should do it. So Reid’s had a pop at the judges for being lenient:
Let’s have some facts:
- The Government says that life actually means serving 18 years. The judge abided by that.
- The Government says that if a person pleads guilty they get a third of their sentence off, and thus a lifer would be serving 12 years. The judge abided by that.
- The Government says that if a person behaves well then they can be out in half the time. Thus a lifer would now be serving six years. The judge abided by that.
- The Government says that sentences should take into account time served on remand. Therefore in this case the lifer serves a further 5 years and 2 months. The judge abided by that.
This is typical New Labour hamstringing of a trained, qualified and respected profession. Judges are appointed to make the difficult decisions, but government steps in and interferes screaming human rights and all that bollocks.
Ask yourself this, who would you rather have had the say about sentencing criminals and keeping the streets safe from these sorts of people?
A gentlemen or lady who has qualified with a Law degree, served their tour of duty on the bar with effective results, demonstrated integrity and was appointed to the bench by his peers in the same profession? Or
"John Reid went to school at Coatbridge. He read History at Stirling University, staying to take a Doctorate in Economic History. He worked as a research officer for the Labour Party from 1979 to 1983. He acted as political adviser to Neil Kinnock from 1983 to 1985 and organised Scottish Trade Unionists for Labour from 1986 to 1987."Or worse,
A fat sex offender who failed his 11 plus? Think about that…
Now Blair stuck his size 9s into the debate today in PMQs by blaming the Tories. Yes, again its all the fault of the Tories. Apparently the sentencing legislation was put in place in 1997 before the Labour party came to power.
Yes… the legislation may have been there under the Tories, but the sentencing legislation is not at fault here, it’s the sentencing guidelines forced on judges. Labour put in those guidelines in 2000.
Tough on crime, Tough for the victims of crime. I fecking hate them all… But don’t forget Guttersnipes, the rising crime rate is our fault.
No comments:
Post a Comment